
Overall per-game value blending offense, defense, and efficiency
Recent form vs season baseline — momentum and trajectory
Defensive impact: contests, steals, rim protection, versatility
How well the player executes within their assigned team role
Shot selection efficiency, range, and difficulty adjustment
Clutch impact on team wins — close games and high-leverage moments
GP
45
GS
0
MPG
22.2
PPG
11.3
RPG
2.5
APG
2.7
SPG
0.6
BPG
0.1
TOV
1.4
FG%
39.0
3P%
32.1
FT%
73.5
Caleb Love fills a niche for POR but impact is limited — BIS 49
Caleb Love is a player for the Trail Blazers, ranking in the 51th percentile league-wide by Baseline Impact Score (49). In 22 minutes per game across 45 starts, Caleb produces 11.3/2.5/2.7 (pts/reb/ast).
Live Form Index: 45/100. Performance has been remarkably consistent — no significant deviation from season baseline. Caleb is doing exactly what he's done all year, no more, no less. Predictable and reliable.
The three-point shot at 32.1% is functional but inconsistent. Defenses will go under screens and sag off, limiting his ability to collapse the defense as a primary ballhandler. The 39.0% field goal clip is concerning — either the shot diet is too difficult, or finishing/touch needs work. This inefficiency costs the offense roughly 1-2 points of production per game.
Off-Ball Impact Score: 48/100.
Caleb fills a specific niche for the Trail Blazers. His value is real but limited in scope — a complementary piece, not a building block.
| Opponent | GP | PTS | +/- | REB | AST | FG% | 3P% | MIN | Matchup |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 20.5 | +9.2 | 3.5 | 2 | 50.0 | 46.7 | 28.5 | Dominates | |
| 2 |
| Date | Opp | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FG | 3P | +/- |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-12 | 15 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4-12 | 3-8 | -14 | |
| 2026-02-07 | 27 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7-18 | 3-11 |
Generated by CourtVision Intelligence Engine — based on current season metrics and game logs
| 2.5 |
| -8.8 |
| 2.5 |
| 2 |
| 12.5 |
| 0.0 |
| 15 |
| Struggles |
| 1 | 20 | +8.7 | 4 | 4 | 42.1 | 33.3 | 34 | Dominates |
| 3 | 4.3 | -7 | 1 | 0.7 | 27.3 | 11.1 | 13.3 | Struggles |
| 1 | 5 | -6.3 | 3 | 2 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 18 | Struggles |
| 1 | 17 | +5.7 | 3 | 1 | 53.8 | 37.5 | 34 | Dominates |
| 3 | 17 | +5.7 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 40.5 | 40.0 | 28 | Dominates |
| 1 | 6 | -5.3 | 2 | 1 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 17 | Struggles |
| 2 | 16.5 | +5.2 | 3.5 | 4 | 39.4 | 31.8 | 28 | Dominates |
| 2 | 15.5 | +4.2 | 1.5 | 3 | 50.0 | 37.5 | 25 | Favorable |
| 2 | 8 | -3.3 | 2 | 2 | 40.0 | 36.4 | 20.5 | Tough |
| 2 | 14.5 | +3.2 | 2.5 | 4 | 39.3 | 29.4 | 27.5 | Favorable |
| 2 | 8.5 | -2.8 | 3 | 1.5 | 35.3 | 27.3 | 20 | Tough |
| 2 | 8.5 | -2.8 | 3.5 | 1.5 | 43.8 | 30.0 | 20 | Tough |
| 1 | 14 | +2.7 | 0 | 2 | 50.0 | 42.9 | 25 | Favorable |
| 3 | 9 | -2.3 | 2.7 | 3 | 38.5 | 35.7 | 16.3 | Tough |
| 1 | 13 | +1.7 | 5 | 4 | 38.5 | 37.5 | 26 | Neutral |
| 2 | 13 | +1.7 | 2.5 | 2 | 42.9 | 42.9 | 24 | Neutral |
| 3 | 10 | -1.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 29.7 | 21.7 | 25 | Neutral |
| 3 | 10 | -1.3 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 44.4 | 33.3 | 17 | Neutral |
| 2 | 10.5 | -0.8 | 1 | 5.5 | 36.0 | 20.0 | 23.5 | Neutral |
| 1 | 12 | +0.7 | 3 | 4 | 41.7 | 33.3 | 26 | Neutral |
| 3 | 11 | -0.3 | 3.7 | 1.7 | 41.4 | 43.8 | 19.7 | Neutral |
| -3 |
| 2026-02-03 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-2 | -2 |
| 2026-02-01 | 30 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8-15 | 3-8 | -5 |
| 2026-01-30 | 27 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5-15 | 2-10 | -11 |
| 2026-01-27 | 17 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2-8 | 0-1 | -5 |
| 2026-01-26 | 26 | 11 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5-14 | 1-7 | -2 |
| 2026-01-23 | 29 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4-9 | 3-6 | -1 |
| 2026-01-22 | 34 | 20 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8-19 | 4-12 | +15 |
| 2026-01-18 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3-10 | 0-4 | +14 |
| 2026-01-17 | 31 | 22 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 8-15 | 4-8 | +23 |
| 2026-01-15 | 26 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 5-12 | 2-6 | +6 |
| 2026-01-13 | 34 | 17 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 5-16 | 2-9 | -14 |
| 2026-01-11 | 29 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8-18 | 5-12 | -11 |
| 2026-01-09 | 25 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6-13 | 4-8 | -7 |